Isn’t this a delightful print, from the September 1810 edition of La Belle Assemblee? I mean...she’s wearing what we would call pantalettes, complete with a triple lace frill round each leg...not to mention sandals. The style itself is surprisingly simple, buttoning up the front. It’s cute as a bug, but certainly unlike any early 19th century evening dress I’ve seen before. Since no text accompanied it. I dug around on-line and found this in Google Books:
No. 2.—A FASHIONABLE SEA-SIDE WALKING DRESSA gown of white French cambric, or pale pink muslin, with long sleeves, and antique cuffs of thin white muslin, trimmed with Mechlin edging; made high in the neck, without a collar, and formed in points at the center of the bosom, with three rows of letting-in lace; confined down the front of the dress with small buttons; and hemmed round the bottom with three rows of deep Mechlin lace; made rather short, and worn over trousers of white French cambric, which are trimmed the same as the bottom of the dress. A cap composed of lace and light green silk trimming, tied under the chin, with a bunch of natural flowers in front. Hair in full ringlet curls, divided in the front of the forehead. A figured short scarf of pale buff, with deep pale-green border, and rich silk tassels; worn according to fancy or convenience; with gloves of pale buff kid; and sandals of pale yellow, or white Morocco, complete this truly simple but becoming dress.
And there you have it—the reason
it’s unlike any other evening dress is because it’s actually a walking dress...and perfect for that. Evidently
an engraver for La Belle Assemblee took a mental vacation while working on
this print, and gave it an incorrect title. Can’t you see a fashionable young
lady out in society, visiting Brighton at the end of the London season,
tripping blithely down the sands (not that Brighton has a very sandy beach),
kicking at the waves, picking up pretty seashells, and generally having a time
of it?☺
No comments:
Post a Comment