It’s been a while since I started doing (and finished up) regular Fashion Forecasts here...and one corollary of that is that I’ve since acquired a lot more prints for any given year. Since the last time we looked at fashions in the year 1810 was back in 2009, I thought I’d post some more prints from my collection...because, eye candy.
Enjoy!
1810 was the year of the
child, at least as far as Ackermann’s Repository was concerned: this particular
year features multiple images of children, which gives us a nice look at what
the fashionable child was wearing...in this instance, from January, not all the
much (someone give that child a sweater!) Mom’s Evening Dress looks much warmer.
My oh my, the fur-lined cloak
in this Carriage or Promenade Dress
from January looks cozy!
Another fur-lined cloak in
February’s Opera Dress—perhaps because
there was no central heating in theatres. Note her opera glass in one hand, the
quizzing glass around her neck, and a copy of the libretto in her hand (at
least, I am assuming that’s what it is).
That’s one chunky
toddler...but what a sweet pose! Note mom’s Morning Dress includes long sleeves and a high neck—possibly a
blouse or a tucker underneath the dress proper. (February)
This print from April is the
ONLY one in Ackermann’s twenty-year run featuring men’s clothing—a pity, don’t
you think? The accompanying text reads
FASHIONS FOR GENTLEMEN
Full Dress.—Superfine corbeau colour coat, with covered buttons;
white Marcella waistcoat, single-breasted; light sage green, or cream-coloured
kerseymere breeches; also those of black florentine silk are very fashionable
and consistent in this style of dress. Dark blue coats, with plain gilt
buttons, are likewise considered fashionable. The cravat is still worn high and
full.
April’s Walking Dress is truly multinational, if you read the description! It always surprises me that even though they’d been at war for decades, French fashions were still all the rage in England.
WALKING OR CARRIAGE COSTUME.
A round high robe of French
cambric, with Armenian collar, and cuffs edged with narrow antique lace; three rows of appliquéd lace beading round the
bottom. An Egyptian mantle of lilac shot sarsnet, trimmed with broad Spanish
binding, and deep thread lace. A Parisian bonnet of the same material,
ornamented with narrow stripes of white satin ribbon, and trimmed at the edge
with lace, or a plaiting of French net. A small French cap, and flowers appearing
in front of the forehead. Chinese parasol, with deep awning of white silk.
Ridicule to correspond. Lilac kid slippers or half-boots. York tan gloves.
Child’s dress of nankeen or buff kerseymere, of the Highland order.
A three-fer! July’s Promenade Dresses are interesting: in particular, the purple one reminds me of dresses one hundred years in the future, ca. World War I. The veil in the middle dress is, er, interesting.
Mom’s Full Dress (September) is very Renaissance inspired, with the
slashed sleeves, broad, framing collar, and lacing in the bodice. The children’s
clothing is charming, I think.
Another first (and only) for
1810: a plate using a church as the background. The description for this Morning Dress reads:
A MORNING DRESS, OR COSTUME A
LA DEVOTION
A plain cambric high gown, with
surplice sleeves, and van dyke border round the throat. A Spanish robe of
pea-green muslin, crape, or sarsnet, bordered with cable trimming, and buttoned
to the shape in front. A winged mob cap, composed of white crape and beading. A
bee-hive bonnet of fine moss or plaited straw, ornamented with white sarsnet
ribbon. Limeric gloves, and Spanish slippers of sea-green kid.
What I’ve loved about the
fashions of 1810 is that they’re different and interesting—not all alike
(1820-22, I’m looking at you)—the Full Dress looked nothing like the Promenade
Dresses, which look nothing like this Evening
or Half Dress, with its embroidered bodice and hem and an embroidered
Indian shawl.
2 comments:
I rather like the blue one with the slashed sleeves. The rest are just sort of Meh to me at the moment.
I like them all a lot. The children's clothes are charming. It's nice to see children shown in fashion plates. However, I would stick to the 18th century styles and be hopelessly dowdy because those slim, column shaped dresses just would not suit me.
Post a Comment